State v. Dickerson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the danger of unfair prejudice did not substantially outweigh the probative value of the evidence because the State did not introduce the evidence to show the defendant had a propensity for that type of crime
• “The evidence of the prior bad acts must be clear and convincing to be admissible.”
• \Unfair prejudice means an undue tendency to suggest decision on an improper basis.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Owens
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-09-04· cited 72×
• State v. Stokes
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-02-17· cited 61×
• State v. Beck
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-21· cited 56×
• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-03-25· cited 52×
• State v. Simmons
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-17· cited 49×
• State v. Rivera
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-02-13· cited 23×
• State v. Holland
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-08-18· cited 8×
• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-03-16· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Alexander
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-04· cited 119×
• State v. Adams
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-29· cited 113×
• State v. King
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-08· cited 49×
• State v. Coleman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-02-20· cited 25×
• State v. Hough
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 23×
• State v. Bolden
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-10-08· cited 20×
• State v. Forney
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-03-25· cited 19×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-11-30· cited 18×