Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/19/2004
State v. McIntosh
Citations
- 595 S.E.2d 484
- 358 S.C. 432
- 2004 S.C. LEXIS 96
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding objection was sufficiently contemporaneous where defendant’s attorney objected after second improper question
- finding objection was sufficiently contemporaneous where defendant's attorney objected after second improper question
- agreeing with principle that a defendant may open the door to evidence of post -Miranda silence by creating the impression that he cooperated with the police, but finding no assertion of cooperation in that case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Hughston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-05-02· cited 16×
- Lupfer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-06-20· cited 8×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-05· cited 7×
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-21· cited 5×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-06-22· cited 5×
- Lupfer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-03· cited 3×
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-21· cited 1×
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-02-03
- State v. Tappia GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-06-28
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1980-06-10· cited 1,359×
- Anderson v. CharlesSupreme Court· 1980-08-11· cited 896×
- United States v. RevelesFifth Circuit· 1999-10-01· cited 85×
- Ralph Rodney Earnest v. Donald Dorsey, Attorney General of the State of New MexicoTenth Circuit· 1996-06-26· cited 83×
- Wentz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-04-15· cited 77×
- State v. ReevesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 75×
- State v. PickensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-01-22· cited 46×
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 37×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-11-17· cited 29×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-11-14· cited 24×
- Kibbe v. DuboisFirst Circuit· 2001-10-23· cited 23×
- United States of America, Ex Rel., Larry Saulsbury v. James Greer, Warden, Menard, Michael Lane, Director of the Department of CorrectionsSeventh Circuit· 1983-03-14· cited 23×
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-06· cited 22×
- Edmond v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 21×
- State v. HollidayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-11-09· cited 21×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-11-30· cited 18×
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-09-23· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.