Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/31/2005

State v. Crawford

Citations

608 S.E.2d 886
362 S.C. 627
2005 S.C. App. LEXIS 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating while it takes at least two members to form a conspiracy, they all need not be indicted or named
finding the contradiction between an accomplice's statement to the police and the subsequent trial testimony disavowing knowledge of the defendant's involvement was a matter of weight for the jury to resolve
“Once an agreement has been reached, the crime of conspiracy has been committed; no further act need take place.”
\[T]he contradiction between [a witness's statement] to police and his later testimony in court is a matter of weight for the jury to decide.\
\It is sufficient that circumstances justify an inference that the accused's actions were motivated as a result of his belief that police officers were aware of his wrongdoing and were seeking him for that purpose.\
“[T]he willful and intentional adoption of a common design by two or more persons is sufficient for criminal conspiracy, provided the common purpose is to do an unlawful act either as a means or an end.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Stilwell, Short

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.