Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 6/25/2009

State v. Vick

Citations

682 S.E.2d 275
384 S.C. 189
2009 S.C. App. LEXIS 274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

vacating a sentence for kidnapping pursuant to section 16-3-910 because the defendant received a concurrent sentence for murder and reaching the issue, even though not challenged at trial, in the interest of judicial economy
vacating a sentence for kidnapping pursuant to section 16-3-910 because the defendant received a concurrent sentence for murder and reaching the issue, even though not challenged at trial, in the interest of judicial economy
vacating a sentence for kidnapping pursuant to section 16- 3-910 because the defendant received a concurrent sentence for murder and reaching the issue, even though not challenged at trial, in the interest of judicial economy
\It is well settled that evidence is not hearsay unless offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.\
\[T]he admission of improper hearsay evidence is harmless where the evidence is merely cumulative to other evidence.\
\[T]he improper admission of hearsay testimony constitutes reversible error only when the admission causes prejudice.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huff, Pieper, Geathers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.