Washington Supreme Court· 7/6/1989
State v. Short
Citations
- 775 P.2d 458
- 113 Wash. 2d 35
- 1989 Wash. LEXIS 85
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the reviewing court determines whether the defendant “reasonably supposed his freedom of action was curtailed”
- court declined to extend the statute beyond its express terms to make it applicable to the Navy
- Where the military employee assumed no greater authority than a private citizen in making an undercover purchase there was no violation of § 375.
- both finding no violation of PCA and also that in any event exclusion is inappropriate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dolliver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LorenzWashington Supreme Court· 2004-07-01· cited 137×
- State v. ValdobinosWashington Supreme Court· 1993-09-09· cited 118×
- State v. HeritageWashington Supreme Court· 2004-08-05· cited 98×
- State v. HandleyWashington Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 94×
- Larry Charbert Hayes v. Warden Hawes and Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General for the State of IllinoisSeventh Circuit· 1990-12-18· cited 52×
- State v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-12-31· cited 49×
- State v. D.R.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-01-30· cited 34×
- State v. WarnessCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-05-01· cited 32×
- State v. RivardWashington Supreme Court· 1997-01-16· cited 23×
- State v. BirnelCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-01-13· cited 22×
- City of College Place v. StaudenmaierCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-28· cited 22×
- State v. PejsaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-25· cited 13×
- State v. OsbornCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-09-24· cited 12×
- State v. PosenjakCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-04-14· cited 12×
- State v. DuffeyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-07-23· cited 11×
- State v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-05-11· cited 10×
- State v. McWattersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-02-18· cited 9×
- State v. UstimenkoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-02-06· cited 9×
- State v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-02-06· cited 6×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2001-04-20· cited 6×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- State v. DictadoWashington Supreme Court· 1984-08-02· cited 132×
- State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court· 1986-10-02· cited 129×
- United States v. Ruby Davidson Walden and William Luther WaldenFourth Circuit· 1974-01-10· cited 90×
- Heinemann v. Whitman CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1986-05-08· cited 74×
- United States v. James Kenneth Roberts, AKA Harold Weber, United States of America v. Clifton Lee HawkNinth Circuit· 1986-01-03· cited 56×
- State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-01-17· cited 55×
- United States v. Joe BaconEleventh Circuit· 1988-08-09· cited 25×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1982-05-04· cited 25×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1973-08-03· cited 24×
- City of Airway Heights v. DilleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-08-21· cited 10×
- Jackson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1977-12-02· cited 9×
- Burkhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1986-10-27· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.