Burkhart v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no substantial violation of the posse comitatus act where undercover agents purchasing drugs in an investigation '\did not assume any greater authority than that of a private citizen . . .'\ in the purchase

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pattioay
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-16· cited 63×
• State v. Short
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-07-06· cited 44×
• Rea v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2001-10-03· cited 44×
• State v. Cooper
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-10-27· cited 12×
• State v. Gunter
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1995-07-26· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Freeman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1984-04-10· cited 59×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1982-05-04· cited 25×
• Hildebrandt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1973-03-13· cited 24×
• Lee v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1973-08-03· cited 24×
• Hubert v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1972-12-13· cited 22×
• Little v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1981-04-17· cited 13×
• Beck v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1984-08-21· cited 1×