United States v. James Kenneth Roberts, AKA Harold Weber, United States of America v. Clifton Lee Hawk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \the clear costs of applying an exclusionary rule are not countervailed by any discernible benefits” especially where the unauthorized use of Navy equipment in violation of the PCA was “unintentional and in good faith\
• noting that \the clear costs of applying an exclusionary rule are not countervailed by any discernible benefits\ especially where the unauthorized use of Navy equipment in violation of the PCA was \unintentional and in good faith\
• finding no violation of PCA but a violation of 10 U. S. C. §§ 371 et seq., and holding exclusionary rule inapplicable by analogy to PCA
• Act extended by Executive Order to include the Navy
• refusing to adopt exclusionary rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).