Larry Charbert Hayes v. Warden Hawes and Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General for the State of Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \there is no Sixth Amendment right to file a pro se brief when the appellant is represented by counsel\
• noting that nothing prohibits an appellate court from considering the arguments in the pro se brief of a defendant who is represented by counsel
• holding military participation to be sufficiently passive where military agents did not arrest, search or seize evidence, but performed activities similar to those of undercover civilians making controlled purchase
• rejecting claim that counsel’s failure to raise defense based on PCA was ineffective assistance of counsel because even if a violation of PCA occurred, exclusionary rule would not apply
• courts have required military participation in civilian law enforcement to be \pervasive\ before finding violation of the Posse Comitatus Act
• NCIS agents’ conduct did not violate the PCA where the agents “merely shared information about drug activity . . . with the police department, aided the police in surveillance . . . , made the undercover buy, and signalled to the police when the transaction was completed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).