Heinemann v. Whitman County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that requesting field sobriety tests during a traffic stop does not subject a suspect to the coercive restraints associated with formal arrest and Miranda warnings are not required
• concluding that requesting field sobriety tests during a traffic stop does not subject a suspect to the coercive restraints associated with formal arrest and Miranda warnings are not required
• request for performance of field sobriety tests during routine traffic stop does not amount to custody so as to require Miranda warnings
• \custody” under former JCrR 2.11(b)(1) which provided that the \right to counsel shall accrue as soon as feasible after the defendant is taken into custody” same as for Miranda purposes
• \custody\ under former JCrR 2.11(b)(1) which provided that the \ right to counsel shall accrue as soon as feasible after the defendant is taken into custody \ same as for Miranda purposes
• seizure and questioning in FSTs permissible under Fourth Amendment and article I, section 7

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).