Skip to main content

Dillon v. State

Citations

  • 781 N.W.2d 588
  • 2010 Minn. App. LEXIS 67
  • 2010 WL 1850337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion in finding aggravating factor of particular cruelty based on “the serious and permanent injuries [appellant] inflicted”
  • concluding that “review of the length of a more-than-doubled sentence should be less deferential”
  • holding that a single aggravating factor is sufficient to justify an upward departure
  • stating that “victim injuries have been relied on in multiple 9 departure cases” and that victim injury may be “a useful indicator of the degree of brutality involved”
  • stating that “we have found no case in which this court or the supreme court has overturned a district court’s decision to depart . . . when adequate departure grounds exist”
  • addressing lack of remorse as a basis for an upward departure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ross, Stoneburner, Stauber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.