State v. Shattuck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Anders does not require fundamental error review at every level of the appellate process
• noting that Anders does not require fundamental error review at every level of the appellate process
• collecting cases and explaining “the sentencing judge [may] impose an aggravated sentence based on prior conduct even if a conviction for that conduct has not been alleged”
• “The system is strained to the point that we cannot afford the luxury of repeated review of trivia or issues of small merit.”
• “once the defendant has been given the appeal to which he has a right, state remedies have been exhausted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).