State v. Kendell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that aggravating sentencing factors need not be charged in an indictment because the “right to a jury trial serves a different purpose than the ‘nature and cause’ requirement and the due process notice requirement”
• concluding that aggravating sentencing factors need not be charged in an indictment because the \right to a jury trial serves a different purpose than the `nature and cause' requirement and the due process notice requirement\
• holding that “[a] single shot squarely in the back can support a finding of premeditation because it indicates that the shooter took careful aim at the victim”
• concluding that offenses were part of a single behavioral incident and therefore related
• noting that manner of killing, including firing multiple gunshots, can support an inference of premeditation and intent
• stating that criminal defendant has right to notice of charges under “due process notice requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).