Washington Supreme Court· 6/9/1988

State v. Scott

Citations

757 P.2d 492
110 Wash. 2d 682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the failure to instruct on a lesser included offense is not a manifest error affecting a constitutional right which would allow review in spite of a failure to object to an instruction
noting that the failure to instruct on a lesser included offense is not a manifest error affecting a constitutional right which would allow review in spite of a failure to object to an instruction
holding an incomplete instruction of the definition of “knowledge” in an instruction on accomplice liability for burglary did not amount to a manifest error affecting a constitutional right
explaining that RAP 2.5(a)(3) “does not help a defendant when the asserted constitutional error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”
explaining that RAP 2.5(a)(3) “does not help a defendant when the asserted constitutional error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”
explaining that RAP 2.5(a)(3) “does not help a defendant when the asserted constitutional error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

240 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Scott

991 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.