Skip to main content

State v. Scott

Citations

  • 33 S.W.3d 746
  • 2000 Tenn. LEXIS 682
  • 2000 WL 1804066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Unsupported assertions that [an] expert is necessary to counter the State’s proof are not sufficient.”
  • the evidence was not properly authenticated when it had been mounted on slides and there was no testimony explaining this alteration in the condition of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice William M. Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

387 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.