Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 829 P.2d 1082
  • 119 Wash. 2d 167
  • 1992 Wash. LEXIS 139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellate courts will not review an issue unsupported by authority or persuasive argument
  • holding, \The jury is permitted to find actual subjective knowledge if there is sufficient information which would lead a reasonable person to believe that a fact exists.\
  • passing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument is insufficient to merit judicial consideration
  • reviewing court will not entertain constitutional issues unsupported by reasoned argument
  • reviewing court will not entertain constitutional issues unsupported by reasoned argument
  • argument raised for first time at oral argument is not properly before the court and need not be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andersen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

151 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.