Washington Supreme Court· 5/21/1992
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 829 P.2d 1082
- 119 Wash. 2d 167
- 1992 Wash. LEXIS 139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellate courts will not review an issue unsupported by authority or persuasive argument
- holding, \The jury is permitted to find actual subjective knowledge if there is sufficient information which would lead a reasonable person to believe that a fact exists.\
- passing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument is insufficient to merit judicial consideration
- reviewing court will not entertain constitutional issues unsupported by reasoned argument
- reviewing court will not entertain constitutional issues unsupported by reasoned argument
- argument raised for first time at oral argument is not properly before the court and need not be considered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andersen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
151 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 973×
- Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-03-27· cited 265×
- Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-05-22· cited 245×
- State v. BrockobWashington Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 202×
- Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2005-09-22· cited 118×
- Palmer v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-04-05· cited 97×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-06-23· cited 97×
- State v. DeVriesWashington Supreme Court· 2003-07-17· cited 95×
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-02-09· cited 90×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 89×
- State v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 86×
- State Ex Rel. Quick-Ruben v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 78×
- State v. GerdtsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-01-17· cited 76×
- State v. HathawayCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-05-03· cited 75×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 1993-06-10· cited 58×
- State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-05-16· cited 54×
- Perry v. Costco Wholesale, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-10-18· cited 45×
- In re the Personal Restraint of DallugeWashington Supreme Court· 2008-01-17· cited 43×
- In Re Personal Restraint of DallugeWashington Supreme Court· 2008-01-17· cited 42×
- State of Washington v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-05-28· cited 40×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 576×
- In Re RosierWashington Supreme Court· 1986-04-10· cited 191×
- State v. ShippWashington Supreme Court· 1980-05-15· cited 146×
- State v. CarverWashington Supreme Court· 1990-04-13· cited 128×
- Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court· 1990-04-26· cited 122×
- State v. LeechWashington Supreme Court· 1990-05-03· cited 112×
- United States v. Thomas W. PhillipsEighth Circuit· 1970-10-14· cited 92×
- City of Yakima v. International Ass'n of Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court· 1991-11-07· cited 81×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-14· cited 78×
- State v. CannWashington Supreme Court· 1979-05-24· cited 64×
- State v. WorrellWashington Supreme Court· 1988-09-08· cited 55×
- Boeing Co. v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court· 1985-01-11· cited 25×
- Dearborn Foundry Co. v. AugustineWashington Supreme Court· 1892-10-11· cited 20×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-05-13· cited 6×
- People v. RoqueNew York Supreme Court· 1981-03-02· cited 5×
- People v. BehnckeCriminal Court of the City of New York· 1988-10-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.