State v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the crime is complete upon the offender declaring his readiness or willingness to sell a controlled substance
• “The proscribed conduct is offering to sell a controlled substance, not offering the controlled substance. Therefore, our analysis of the statute should not turn on whether appellant transferred a controlled substance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mughni
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1987-11-04· cited 116×
• State v. Patterson
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1982-02-24· cited 59×
• State v. Chandler
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-05-24· cited 55×
• State v. Sway
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-12-31· cited 35×
• State v. Alhashimi
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-18· cited 5×
• State v. Linner
  Hamilton County Municipal Court· 1996-02-02· cited 5×
• State v. Gutierrez
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-12· cited 4×
• In re M.D.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-17· cited 2×
• State v. Vaughn
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-30· cited 1×
• State v. Stover
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-31· cited 1×
• State v. Spivery
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-15· cited 1×
• State v. Coleman
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-19· cited 1×
• State v. Milton
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-18
• State v. Byrd
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-03
• State v. Shackelford
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-11
• State v. Russell
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-23

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rose v. Locke
  Supreme Court· 1975-11-17· cited 516×
• State v. Marian
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-05-28· cited 25×