Supreme Court· 2/14/1949
McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.
Citations
- 336 U.S. 187
- 69 S. Ct. 497
- 93 L. Ed. 2d 599
- 1949 U.S. LEXIS 3014
- 93 L. Ed. 599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that willfulness is not an element of civil contempt
- Because civil 9 contempt serves a remedial purpose, “it matters not with what 10 intent the defendant did the prohibited act.”
- a civil sanction is “remedial in nature and intended to enforce compliance.”
- “The absence of wilfulness does not relieve from civil contempt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas, Rutledge, Frankfurter, Jackson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
825 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-17· cited 742×
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 735×
- Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 724×
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 576×
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 563×
- Taggart v. LorenzenSupreme Court· 2019-06-03· cited 478×
- State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 461×
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-03-13· cited 394×
- In Re Thomas James Dyer, Debtor. Nancy Knupfer, Trustee v. John Lindblade, in Re Thomas James Dyer, Debtor, John Lindblade v. Nancy Knupfer, TrusteeNinth Circuit· 2003-03-13· cited 382×
- Jove Engineering, Inc. v. Internal Revenue ServiceEleventh Circuit· 1996-08-29· cited 352×
- Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. KreikemeierNebraska Supreme Court· 2010-04-16· cited 342×
- Ex Parte BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-05-24· cited 312×
- Windham Bank v. TomaszczykOhio Supreme Court· 1971-06-30· cited 287×
- United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2009-05-22· cited 260×
- Pugh v. PughOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-31· cited 251×
- Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1986-12-10· cited 248×
- United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.First Circuit· 1985-03-21· cited 229×
- State v. NgWashington Supreme Court· 1988-02-18· cited 225×
- Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2001-08-16· cited 209×
- In Re Homer G. Walters and Evolene Walters, Debtors. Charles L. Burd v. Homer G. Walters and Evolene WaltersFourth Circuit· 1989-03-01· cited 207×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court· 1947-03-06· cited 2,872×
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court· 1946-06-03· cited 848×
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court· 1948-02-09· cited 646×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 630×
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court· 1943-01-18· cited 621×
- Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1945-01-29· cited 448×
- May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1945-12-10· cited 352×
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court· 1939-05-15· cited 348×
- Penfield Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court· 1947-05-05· cited 327×
- United States v. Crescent Amusement Co.Supreme Court· 1944-12-18· cited 266×
- Oriel v. RussellSupreme Court· 1929-01-14· cited 246×
- Union Tool Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1922-05-15· cited 149×
- Inland Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-01-30· cited 102×
- Public Service Commission v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1941-04-28· cited 83×
- Jacksonville Paper Co. v. McCombFifth Circuit· 1948-03-23· cited 15×
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.S.D. Florida· 1947-01-23· cited 8×
Other cases named McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.