Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 674 P.2d 145
  • 100 Wash. 2d 607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that production-shifting presumptions are to be judged under same standard as permissive presumptions
  • holding that the specific crime intended is not an \element\ of burglary
  • holding that production-shifting presumptions are to be judged under same standard as permissive presumptions
  • finding constitutional instructional error where the jury instructions omitted an element of the crime
  • finding constitutional instructional error where the jury instructions omitted an element of the crime
  • court found that language \unless such entering or remaining shall be explained by evidence satisfactory to you\ may have been interpreted as a mandatory presumption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Utter, Rosellini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.