Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/29/1998
State v. Scott
Citations
- 961 P.2d 667
- 265 Kan. 1
- 1998 Kan. LEXIS 372
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that legislature has enacted sexual offender registration requirements so that public has opportunity to defend themselves from danger posed by sex offenders
- recognizing right to interpret Kansas Constitution in manner different than United States Constitution but not traditionally doing so
- Punitive effect of notification provisions of KSORA not so disproportionate to Scott's crime as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment.
- Eighth Amendment and Section 9 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights are nearly identical and construed similarly
- Eighth Amendment and Section 9 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights are nearly identical and construed similarly
- \The Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clauses of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and § 9 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights are nearly identical and are to be construed similarly.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-06· cited 152×
- State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-12-28· cited 144×
- State v. MossmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-07-27· cited 136×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-05-16· cited 85×
- State v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-04-13· cited 78×
- State v. LawsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-04-05· cited 71×
- State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-07-21· cited 35×
- State v. SnellingSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-03-05· cited 18×
- State v. RiffeSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-06-08· cited 17×
- State v. SchadCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-04-24· cited 16×
- McComb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-07-23· cited 15×
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-03-15· cited 14×
- State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1999-06-04· cited 13×
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1999-11-24· cited 10×
- State v. GensonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-12-18· cited 5×
- Van Dyke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-06-20· cited 2×
- Watson v. City of Kansas CityD. Kansas· 2001-11-21· cited 1×
- People v. McKownIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-09-20
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 2003-07-14
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 2004-03-19
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 4,836×
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 4,521×
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court· 1983-06-28· cited 4,242×
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 2,234×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
- Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court· 1982-03-22· cited 815×
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-25· cited 688×
- Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Third Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 301×
- Russell v. GregoireNinth Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 193×
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-08-23· cited 141×
- In Re the Care & Treatment of HaySupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-01-30· cited 98×
- Murphy v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-07-26· cited 86×
- State v. SchultzSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-04-16· cited 63×
- State v. SteadmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-07-09· cited 52×
- State v. ScherzerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-03-04· cited 52×
- State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-01-26· cited 43×
- Doe v. KelleyW.D. Michigan· 1997-03-28· cited 40×
- W.P. v. PoritzD. New Jersey· 1996-07-01· cited 38×
- State v. CoutcherSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-03-04· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.