Washington Supreme Court· 2/11/1993

State v. Benn

Citations

845 P.2d 289
120 Wash. 2d 631
1993 Wash. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that preponderance finding upheld if there is substantial evidence in the record to support it
stating that preponderance finding upheld if there is substantial evidence in the record to support it
\remorse or confession of a crime by the defendant may be viewed by prosecutors or juries as significant mitigation\
“remorse or confession of a crime by the defendant may be viewed by prosecutors or juries as significant mitigation”
witness's drug dealing \did not impact [his] ability to relate his discussions with Benn on the witness stand\
to be admissible under ER 404(b), a prior bad act must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy, Durham, Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

151 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

90 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Benn

17 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.