Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/21/2005

State v. Schneider

Citations

120 P.3d 16
201 Or. App. 546
2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that statements such as “[t]hat works,” and “[o]kay,” and “[t]hat would do it,” may constitute express consent to a proposed delay
lack of judicial resources justified delay where such lack of resources was the express basis for trial court’s decision to delay, and where the defendant, on appeal, failed to contest the adequacy of the record to support court’s rationale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer, Edmonds, Landau, Haselton, Armstrong, Linder, Wollheim, Schuman, Ortega, Rosenblum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.