Oregon Supreme Court· 8/4/2005

State v. Johnson

Citations

116 P.3d 879
339 Or. 69
2005 Ore. LEXIS 461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the speedy trial statutes “were associated, fairly early on, with the constitutional speedy trial guarantee”
recognizing the “well-established principle that it is the state’s obligation, and not the defendant’s, to bring a defendant to trial within a reasonable period of time”
discerning legislature’s “clear 90 Dowell v. Oregon Mutual Ins. Co. overall purpose in enacting” the statute
rejecting the application of the abuse of discretion standard in reviewing the trial court’s reasonableness determination under ORS 135.747
declining to apply doctrine where it would render a statute’s meaning implausible “in the context of [Supreme Court] case law and the general assumption that statutes are rational”
declining to apply doctrine where it would render a statute’s meaning implausible “in the context of [Supreme Court] case law and the general assumption that statutes are rational.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.