Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/22/2006

State v. Schneider

Citations

131 P.3d 842
204 Or. App. 710
2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that defendant consented to delay under similar circumstances
rejecting defendant’s attempt to withdraw on reconsideration an express concession made on appeal and to advance a new argument
“We have held many times that a contention not raised in the brief on appeal will not be entertained for the first time on reconsideration.”
date of indictment rather than original citation identified as starting point for the “period of time” under ORS 135.747
“We have held many times that a contention not raised in the brief on appeal will not be enter- tained for the first time on reconsideration.”
a trial court does not err in denying a motion to strike and motion for mistrial when the evidence is relevant to a fact that must be determined by the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer, Edmonds, Landau, Haselton, Armstrong, Linder, Wollheim, Schuman, Ortega, Rosenblum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.