State v. Brunoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court correctly considered the proper criteria under Johnson anAAdams
• reaching similar conclusion where, in light of predetermined decision to postpone, defendant’s counsel responded, “That works,” to a proposed new trial date
• whether a defendant has consented to delay must be determined by reference to the context in which such expressions as “that works” are stated
• net delay of nearly 12.4 months in misdemeanor case held to exceed expectations
• state is unitary body and trial court delays are attributable to state
• attributing similar delay to state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).