Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/19/2008

State v. Dixon

Citations

197 P.3d 1106
224 Or. App. 66
2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a 14-month delay, of which six were due to routine delays and eight were due to lack of judicial resources, was reasonable
concluding that a total delay of 14 months was reasonable where each period of individual delay was adequately explained and “not prompted by a request of the prosecution”
finding that state did not preserve the argument that the relevant beginning date under the speedy trial statute was the date the information was filed because the state used the date of the original indictment before the trial court and such use “induced” the trial court’s ruling
14-month delay on misdemeanor offenses held reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer, Edmonds, Landau, Haselton, Armstrong, Wollheim, Schuman, Ortega, Rosenblum, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.