State v. Purdom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a prosecution commences for the purposes of ORS 135.747 from the date of the superseding charging instrument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bayer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-01· cited 19×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-23· cited 14×
• State v. Cunningham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-11-18· cited 9×
• State v. Coulson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-01· cited 6×
• State v. Murr
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-01-09· cited 3×
• State v. Ellis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-29· cited 3×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-08-04· cited 87×
• State v. Emery
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-03-24· cited 62×
• State v. Adams
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-08-04· cited 51×
• State v. Davids
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-08-04· cited 36×
• Abbott v. Baldwin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-12-05· cited 26×
• Bertram v. Malheur County
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-09-19· cited 24×
• State v. Breaw
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1904-12-19· cited 23×
• State v. Schneider
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-09-21· cited 19×
• State v. Schneider
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-03-22· cited 16×
• State v. Vasquez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-04-15· cited 15×
• State v. Hampton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-25· cited 15×