Oregon Supreme Court· 4/1/1924
State v. Lee
Citations
- 110 Or. 682
- 224 P. 627
- 1924 Ore. LEXIS 230
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that “good cause” was shown by general trial court order continuing all cases until succeeding term that was order within general discretion of trial court
- concluding, in interpreting the same statute, that good cause was shown where the “accumulation of business rendered] trial impossible” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- describing question of whether to grant a continuance as “vested by law in the trial court”
- “The right guaranteed by our fundamental law for a ‘speedy’ hearing applies alike to civil and criminal causes.”
- right to speedy trial not contravened when ‘accumulation of business render [s] trial impossible’
- right to speedy trial not contravened when “accumulation of business render[s] trial impossible”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court· 2005-08-04· cited 87×
- State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court· 2005-08-04· cited 51×
- State of Oregon v. KuhnhausenOregon Supreme Court· 1954-06-17· cited 51×
- State v. HarbertsOregon Supreme Court· 2000-09-14· cited 43×
- State v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-09-21· cited 19×
- State v. EllisonOregon Supreme Court· 1957-03-13· cited 7×
- State v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 7×
- State v. LozanoUtah Supreme Court· 1969-12-15· cited 6×
- State v. TatarinovCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-03-14· cited 5×
- State v. HutchinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-04-26· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BatehamOregon Supreme Court· 1919-12-30· cited 40×
- State v. BertschingerOregon Supreme Court· 1919-01-07· cited 18×
- Ex parte LarkinNevada Supreme Court· 1876-04-15· cited 9×
- Glover's caseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1872-03-15· cited 8×
- State v. MollineauxSupreme Court of Missouri· 1899-05-23· cited 7×
- State v. HechtSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-11-08· cited 6×
- Nixon v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.