Skip to main content

State v. Ross

Citations

  • 189 Conn. 42
  • 454 A.2d 266
  • 1983 Conn. LEXIS 424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[i]n an appeal from [a final] judgment a party may claim error in any ruling of the trial court”
  • “[a]n appellant cannot ordinarily claim error in the action of the trial court which he has induced”
  • [a]n appellant cannot ordinarily claim error in the action of the trial court which he has induced
  • state may seek dismissal under § 54-56 even though statute contains no express authorization for motion thereunder by state
  • \We do not believe that the availability of appellate review should turn wholly upon the identity of the party who has invoked judicial recognition of the moribund status of the prosecution.\
  • the use of a writ of error would in no way overcome the objections ... to the appeal process based upon . . . the absence of finality in the judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Speziale, Peters, Healey, Parskey, Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.