· 2/17/1989
State v. Hinckley
Citations
- 777 P.2d 417
- 13 Kan. App. 2d 417
- 777 P.2d 857
- 1989 Kan. App. LEXIS 109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing restitution amount based on the replacement costs of the stolen property rather than the value of the property at the time it was stolen
- vacating a restitution order and remanding for a second restitution hearing because the district court ordered defendant to pay the replacement value of the stolen property less 15 percent rather than the fair market value
- \We vacate the 8 amount of restitution ordered and remand for a second restitution hearing to determine the amount of restitution to be awarded.\
- amount of restitution ordered after a plea of nolo contendere was vacated
- amount of restitution ordered after a plea of nolo contendere was vacated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Abbott, Davis, Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.