Supreme Court· 1/2/1929
Cogen v. United States
Citations
- 278 U.S. 221
- 49 S. Ct. 118
- 73 L. Ed. 275
- 1929 U.S. LEXIS 7
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a pretrial decision on a motion to suppress is not a final appealable order
- denial of defendant's pre-trial motion for suppression and return of seized property not \final\
- denial of defendant’s pre-trial motion for suppression and return of seized property not “final”
- a preliminary motion may be denied and then the objection to the evidence sustained at trial
- appeal unavailable from denial of post-indictment motion to suppress
- trial court may reconsider evidentiary motion denied prior to trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brandeis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
205 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 2,295×
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1940-02-26· cited 1,204×
- Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-01-05· cited 885×
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court· 1978-05-01· cited 806×
- Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-03-03· cited 769×
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-03-19· cited 657×
- Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-04-16· cited 463×
- Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court· 1955-01-10· cited 462×
- United States v. HubbardD.C. Circuit· 1980-07-24· cited 350×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 328×
- United States v. Wallace & Tiernan Co.Supreme Court· 1949-05-09· cited 165×
- Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-08-16· cited 159×
- The Borden Company v. William Sylk and Harry S. Sylk v. Penrose Industries Corporation Sylvan Seal Milk, Inc.Third Circuit· 1969-05-13· cited 143×
- In Re FriedSecond Circuit· 1947-06-23· cited 126×
- United States v. Premises Known as 608 Taylor Ave., Apartment 302, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Appeal of Harold MargolisThird Circuit· 1978-09-21· cited 121×
- McGrath v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals· 1975-04-01· cited 120×
- Sovereign News Co. v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1983-01-11· cited 119×
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationSecond Circuit· 1942-05-06· cited 108×
- Junius S. Washington v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1968-04-26· cited 86×
- State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-09· cited 86×
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-10-12· cited 1,597×
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-11-21· cited 1,400×
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1921-02-28· cited 1,256×
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court· 1921-06-01· cited 1,253×
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court· 1882-05-18· cited 1,026×
- Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 727×
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 688×
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1918-05-06· cited 514×
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1906-03-12· cited 300×
- Collins v. MillerSupreme Court· 1920-03-29· cited 263×
- Dumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-05-25· cited 249×
- Union Tool Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1922-05-15· cited 149×
- Segurola v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-11-21· cited 149×
- Essgee Co. of China v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1923-05-07· cited 134×
- Steele v. United States No. 2Supreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 124×
- Giles v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1922-10-28· cited 104×
- Veeder v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1918-03-09· cited 75×
- Ex Parte TiffanySupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 66×
- United States v. CasinoS.D. New York· 1923-02-14· cited 50×
- Oneida Navigation Corp. v. W. & S. Job & Co.Supreme Court· 1920-04-19· cited 47×
Other cases named Cogen v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.