Supreme Court of Connecticut· 10/31/1978
State v. Flower
Citations
- 176 Conn. 224
- 405 A.2d 655
- 1978 Conn. LEXIS 967
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where no record upon which determination of guilt could be made without further proceedings, double jeopardy barred appeal
- state may not appeal judgment of acquittal by reason of insanity rendered by three judge panel
- successive prosecution after defendant found not guilty by reason of insanity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bogdanski, Cotter, Loiselle, Longo, Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-09· cited 442×
- State v. VassSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-12-20· cited 82×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-01-11· cited 62×
- Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capitol Crane Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1986-01-21· cited 59×
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-28· cited 53×
- State v. JacobowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-01-20· cited 43×
- Bower v. D'OnfroConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-08-08· cited 23×
- State v. SouthardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-11-29· cited 19×
- State v. PaolellaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-02-14· cited 18×
- State v. KasprzykSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-01-09· cited 16×
- State v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-03-04· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.