Supreme Court of Minnesota· 10/11/1974
State v. Hicks
Citations
- 222 N.W.2d 345
- 301 Minn. 350
- 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that absence of one indicator of intoxication does not render layperson’s observations insufficient to offer opinion testimony about defendant’s intoxication
- concluding that an order preventing the chance of a successful prosecution on one charge was sufficient to allow an appeal even though the other charges were not affected
- suppression order ap-pealable because suppressed evidence necessary for conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacLaughlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-01-11· cited 62×
- State v. UnderdahlSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-04-30· cited 50×
- Holtz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1983-12-07· cited 42×
- State v. NoltingSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-04-01· cited 30×
- State v. DilgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-07-30· cited 29×
- State of Minnesota v. Derek Lawrence StavishSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-19· cited 27×
- Kozak v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-12-18· cited 26×
- State v. ZaisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-10-26· cited 21×
- Rude v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-04-17· cited 19×
- Martin v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-08-14· cited 15×
- State v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-01-14· cited 12×
- State v. ArdsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-07-16· cited 10×
- Johnson v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-07-06· cited 9×
- State v. GawrylukNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-06-28· cited 7×
- Kunz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-06-12· cited 5×
- Romero v. City of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-04-22· cited 4×
- Keane v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-12-31· cited 4×
- State v. GrohoskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-07-08· cited 4×
- State v. MarinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-04-23· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strand v. Village of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1955-10-28· cited 38×
- State v. KinnSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-07-10· cited 31×
- State v. SimonsenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-05-02· cited 22×
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1963-07-12· cited 20×
- City of St. Paul v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1959-07-10· cited 18×
- McKillop v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1893-06-21· cited 16×
- Trail v. Village of Elk RiverSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-03-26· cited 15×
- Clarke v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1904-06-24· cited 12×
- State v. DurenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1963-08-23· cited 10×
- State v. DaxSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-06-18· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.