Skip to main content

State v. Cruz

Citations

  • 269 Conn. 97
  • 848 A.2d 445
  • 2004 Conn. LEXIS 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining review where court used exact language from defendant's request to charge and no exception taken
  • declining review where court used exact language from defendant’s request to charge and no exception taken
  • reviewing state's alternate ground for affirming Appellate Court's judgment, even though state had not expressly raised as alternate ground for affirmance, without addressing question of whether claim had been raised in Appellate Court
  • declining to review claim of induced error where \challenged jury instruction repeated the exact language that the defendant had requested\ [emphasis omitted]
  • Golding review is not available for unpreserved claims of induced instructional error
  • “[w]hether the Appellate Court properly employed Golding review presents a question of law over which our review is plenary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vertefeuille

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.