Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/24/1990
State v. Bergin
Citations
- 214 Conn. 657
- 574 A.2d 164
- 1990 Conn. LEXIS 117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting denial of permission to appeal under General Statutes § 54-96 to be reviewable only under an “abuse of discretion” standard
- defendant failed to show how he would be prejudiced by an amendment to the information, pursuant to Practice Book § 623, prior to commencement of trial
- this court has granted state permission to appeal where trial court has abused its discretion
- when “time is not of the essence or [the] gist of the offense, the precise time at which it is charged to have been committed is not material” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- time not element of offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan, Covello, Healey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-09· cited 582×
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-18· cited 407×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-30· cited 214×
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-03· cited 212×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2012-10-25· cited 198×
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-07· cited 167×
- Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-06-28· cited 164×
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-12· cited 157×
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-04-25· cited 129×
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-05-28· cited 96×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-01-30· cited 89×
- State v. MerriamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-07-15· cited 88×
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-22· cited 63×
- State v. PappasSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-24· cited 50×
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-07-28· cited 48×
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-08-13· cited 45×
- State v. BarnettConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-06-01· cited 34×
- State v. AnonymousSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-06· cited 33×
- Seebeck v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-25· cited 33×
- State v. BattsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-03-20· cited 30×
Cites
79 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court· 1953-02-09· cited 2,465×
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 2,420×
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court· 1985-12-03· cited 1,743×
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 1,668×
- Patton v. YountSupreme Court· 1984-06-26· cited 1,463×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1975-02-25· cited 1,334×
- People v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-11-30· cited 323×
- Maggio v. FulfordSupreme Court· 1983-06-06· cited 320×
- Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 288×
- Pioneer Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1983-08-23· cited 229×
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-30· cited 222×
- United States v. Kirk C. ReivichEighth Circuit· 1986-06-25· cited 215×
- United States v. AddonizioThird Circuit· 1971-09-16· cited 214×
- Loctite Corp. v. Broadview Chemical Corp.Supreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 208×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 192×
- Barker v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1986-04-28· cited 174×
- Mallery v. BlackburnSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 168×
- United States v. Lance DozierNinth Circuit· 1988-07-06· cited 152×
Other cases named State v. Bergin
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.