DiBella v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the denial of motion for return of forfeited property is a final, appealable order when the “motion [wa]s solely for return of property”
• acknowledging that suppression orders in criminal trials are \truly interlocutory\
• acknowledging that suppression orders in criminal trials are “truly interlocutory”
• “Orders granting or denying suppression in the wake of such proceedings are truly interlocutory, for the criminal trial is then fairly in train.”
• “[T]he delays and disruptions attendant upon intermediate appeal are especially inimical to the effective and fair administration of the criminal law.”
• federal government has no inherent right of appeal in criminal case, and grant of general appellate jurisdiction does not authorize such an appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).