Arizona Supreme Court· 7/14/1998
State v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 961 P.2d 1006
- 192 Ariz. 58
- 273 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 28
- 1998 Ariz. LEXIS 68
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the superior court need not give every requested instruction if the instructions adequately cover the law
- holding a trial court need not give every specific instruction requested by the defense: “the test is whether the [given] instructions adequately set forth the law applicable to the case”
- holding a trial court need not give every specific instruction requested by the defense: “the test is whether the [given] instructions adequately set forth the law applicable to the case”
- stating court will not reverse a conviction if it can conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that an error did not influence the verdict
- explaining a “party is entitled to an instruction on any theory reasonably supported by the evidence”
- applying harmless-error review to the refusal of a requested jury instruction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGregor, Zlaket, Jones, Feldman, Martone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. EllisonArizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-09· cited 257×
- State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-14· cited 207×
- State v. HughesArizona Supreme Court· 1998-11-19· cited 195×
- State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 180×
- James McKinney v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2015-12-29· cited 154×
- State of Arizona v. Steven John ParkerArizona Supreme Court· 2013-03-13· cited 110×
- State v. CanezArizona Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 94×
- State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn HausnerArizona Supreme Court· 2012-07-10· cited 89×
- State v. GarzaArizona Supreme Court· 2007-06-29· cited 83×
- State v. CañezArizona Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 80×
- State v. BearupArizona Supreme Court· 2009-07-17· cited 78×
- State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court· 2006-05-09· cited 78×
- State v. RutledgeArizona Supreme Court· 2003-04-07· cited 65×
- State v. SansingArizona Supreme Court· 2001-07-02· cited 58×
- State v. MartinezArizona Supreme Court· 2000-05-11· cited 56×
- State v. CarlsonArizona Supreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 54×
- Martin Fong v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2014-07-25· cited 50×
- State of Arizona v. Efren MedinaArizona Supreme Court· 2013-08-22· cited 49×
- State v. BlakleyArizona Supreme Court· 2003-03-27· cited 45×
- Lemke v. RayesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-08-15· cited 44×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 769×
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 326×
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 276×
- State v. MottArizona Supreme Court· 1997-01-16· cited 160×
- State v. GallegosArizona Supreme Court· 1994-03-15· cited 158×
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court· 1993-09-30· cited 113×
- State v. CornellArizona Supreme Court· 1994-08-02· cited 97×
- Michael Davis Taylor v. J.S. Stainer, WardenNinth Circuit· 1994-08-03· cited 94×
- State v. AxleyArizona Supreme Court· 1982-05-10· cited 89×
- State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-13· cited 75×
- State v. BerryArizona Supreme Court· 1966-10-19· cited 74×
- State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court· 1996-07-02· cited 57×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-10· cited 50×
- State v. BurtonArizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 47×
- Singh v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1929-09-23· cited 45×
- State v. HughesArizona Supreme Court· 1997-05-06· cited 41×
- State v. ShumwayArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-26· cited 39×
- Ferguson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1971-09-24· cited 38×
- State v. BarnesArizona Supreme Court· 1980-01-11· cited 34×
- State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court· 1977-03-09· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.