Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 486 A.2d 196
  • 302 Md. 175
  • 1985 Md. LEXIS 530

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that accused’s alibi statement was sufficient to require jury instruction even though uncorroborated
  • ruling that “[t]he type of confusion and inconsistency contained in this and other testimony given by Smith at trial neither rises to, nor even approaches, the level of unreliability which would place it within the narrow ambit of the principle set forth by the Court in Kucharczyk”
  • in turn quoting Bruce v. State, 218 Md. 87, 97, 145 A.2d 428, 433 (1958)
  • “The instruction should be given in every case where there is sufficient evidence to take the issue to the jury.” (citations and quotation marks omitted)
  • “ ‘[A] defendant may offer uncorroborated testimony and thereupon become entitled to an instruction on such defenses as ... duress ....”’
  • “The instruction should be given in every case where there is sufficient evidence to take the issue to the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky, Couch, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.