Supreme Court of Minnesota· 12/31/1992
State v. Richards
Citations
- 495 N.W.2d 187
- 1992 Minn. LEXIS 393
- 1992 WL 394738
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Under our system of jurisprudence, every criminal defendant has the right to be treated with fundamental fairness and afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.” (quotation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-09-16· cited 181×
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-10-23· cited 77×
- State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-18· cited 74×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-01-11· cited 73×
- State v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-15· cited 70×
- Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-07-18· cited 60×
- State v. BeecroftSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-05-23· cited 58×
- State v. NetlandSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-02-12· cited 57×
- State v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-07-18· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-03-15· cited 55×
- State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-12-08· cited 54×
- State v. MuntSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-31· cited 51×
- State v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-07-23· cited 49×
- State v. CrimsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-11-28· cited 48×
- State v. QuickSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-04-10· cited 44×
- State v. HannonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-18· cited 43×
- State of Minnesota v. Christopher Thomas WentheSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-06-24· cited 43×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-07-20· cited 42×
- State v. TovarSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-02-17· cited 36×
- STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-03-09· cited 32×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 2,329×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 1,461×
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-08-17· cited 63×
- United States v. Lloyd D. SloanTenth Circuit· 1985-11-12· cited 56×
- Harold Lee Batsell v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Eighth Circuit· 1969-02-24· cited 49×
- State v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-06-01· cited 47×
- State v. DarveauxSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-04-16· cited 44×
- United States v. Samuel BuchbinderSeventh Circuit· 1986-07-15· cited 43×
- Capriola v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1932-07-22· cited 34×
- In Re the Welfare of D.A.G.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-05-15· cited 32×
- State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-01-25· cited 30×
- State v. LuciowSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-03-26· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.