Skip to main content
· 7/15/1986

United States v. Samuel Buchbinder

Citations

  • 796 F.2d 910
  • 21 Fed. R. Serv. 9
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • giving notice of expert testimony two weeks prior to trial and filing a psychiatrist’s report one week before trial violated Rule 12.2(b)
  • government’s “actual” notice of the defendant’s intention to introduce expert testimony does not absolve defendant of the responsibility to comply with Rule 12.2(b)
  • district court did not abuse discretion in refusing to allow expert witnesses to testify when defendant failed to timely notify pursuant to Rule 12.2(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Coffey, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.