Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/1/1990
State v. Richards
Citations
- 456 N.W.2d 260
- 1990 Minn. LEXIS 168
- 1990 WL 71635
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that defendant unequivocally asserted his right to self-representation when he filed two written motions demanding his right to self-representation
- concluding that a district court’s finding of invalid waiver “misapprehends the governing law and is clearly erroneous”
- noting that the validity of a defendant’s waiver of rights “‘depends, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding the case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused’” (quotation omitted)
- presuming attorney who represented defendant at waiver proceeding advised defendant so that he could make informed decision
- discussing the standard used to determine whether a waiver of the right to counsel is knowing and intelligent
- waiver of counsel intelligently made when defendant had general understanding of court protocol and rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coyne, Simonett, Yetka
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. DavidoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-02-25· cited 114×
- State v. WorthySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-20· cited 109×
- State v. BlomSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-07-01· cited 103×
- State v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-31· cited 86×
- State v. CamachoSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-03-20· cited 76×
- State v. PenkatySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 61×
- Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-07-18· cited 60×
- State v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-07-18· cited 56×
- Dereje v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-10-09· cited 47×
- State v. RhoadsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-05-23· cited 33×
- State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-08-14· cited 24×
- State v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-02-13· cited 19×
- State v. ThornbladCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-03-15· cited 16×
- Holt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-09-03· cited 16×
- State v. TowleSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-12-14· cited 15×
- In Re RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-10-05· cited 11×
- State v. PaigeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-05-12· cited 10×
- State v. ParsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-06-26· cited 7×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-03-15· cited 6×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-11-08· cited 4×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-02-21· cited 989×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-03-15· cited 570×
- Lewis Donald Fritz v. James SpaldingNinth Circuit· 1982-07-27· cited 92×
- Michael C. Tuitt v. Michael Fair, Massachusetts Commissioner of CorrectionsFirst Circuit· 1987-06-04· cited 88×
- Gregory Johnstone v. Walter J. Kelly, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, RespondentSecond Circuit· 1986-12-24· cited 78×
- Joseph Anthony Meeks v. Walter Craven, WardenNinth Circuit· 1973-07-20· cited 67×
- State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-05-18· cited 59×
- State v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-08-20· cited 54×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-05-26· cited 37×
- State v. SeifertSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-04-29· cited 25×
- Wiesner v. AbramsE.D. New York· 1989-12-04· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.