Skip to main content

State v. Richards

Citations

  • 456 N.W.2d 260
  • 1990 Minn. LEXIS 168
  • 1990 WL 71635

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant unequivocally asserted his right to self-representation when he filed two written motions demanding his right to self-representation
  • concluding that a district court’s finding of invalid waiver “misapprehends the governing law and is clearly erroneous”
  • noting that the validity of a defendant’s waiver of rights “‘depends, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding the case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused’” (quotation omitted)
  • presuming attorney who represented defendant at waiver proceeding advised defendant so that he could make informed decision
  • discussing the standard used to determine whether a waiver of the right to counsel is knowing and intelligent
  • waiver of counsel intelligently made when defendant had general understanding of court protocol and rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coyne, Simonett, Yetka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.