Skip to main content

State v. Al-Naseer

Citations

  • 788 N.W.2d 469
  • 2010 Minn. LEXIS 546
  • 2010 WL 3583014

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “heightened 3 scrutiny applies to any disputed element of the conviction that is based on circumstantial evidence”
  • stating that the appellate court reviews the facts and the legitimate inferences drawn therefrom to decide whether the evidence supports the guilty verdict
  • stating that the heightened-scrutiny standard applies to any disputed element of the conviction that is based on circumstantial evidence
  • stating that a theory is not “conjecture or speculation” when a defendant “points to evidence in the record that is consistent with a rational theory other than guilt” (quotation omitted)
  • stating that “[a] conviction based on circumstantial evidence . . . warrants heightened scrutiny”
  • stating that “a defendant is not relying on conjecture or speculation when [he] . . . points to evidence in the record that is consistent with a rational theory other than guilt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Page

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Al-Naseer

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.