State v. Al-Naseer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that for purposes of criminal vehicular homicide for leaving the scene, a defendant must know he was in an 13 accident with a person or vehicle because “failure to stop is not a crime in all circumstances”
• adopting a mens rea element of knowledge that the defendant was in an accident with a person or another vehicle
• relying on an earlier version of a statute to ascertain legislative intent
• “The proof of knowledge may be by circumstantial evidence.”
• \The proof of knowledge may be by circumstantial evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).