State v. Darveaux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that theft by shoplifting is not a crime of dishonesty or false statement
• holding that a “physical lineup was merely confirmatory” and, therefore, “did not cause a substantial likelihood of misidentification” because the witnesses “had already positively identified defendant in a valid photographic display”
• holding that a \physical lineup was merely confirmatory\ and, therefore, \did not cause a substantial likelihood of misidentification\ because the witnesses \had already positively identified defendant in a valid photographic display\
• holding that a “physical lineup was merely confirmatory” and, therefore, “did not cause a substantial likelihood of misidentification” because the witnesses “had already positively identified defendant in a valid photographic display”
• holding that evidence of drugs found in the defendant's purse two days after drug store robbery was admissible as immediate-episode evidence where the drugs were the same type of drugs stolen from the drug store
• four-man physical line up was unduly suggestive where defendant was only man in lineup whose photograph had been shown to eyewitnesses, and suspect was described as having limp and defendant was only man in lineup who limped

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).