Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/9/1987
Gates v. State
Citations
- 398 N.W.2d 558
- 1987 Minn. LEXIS 691
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that under Strickland, defendant must show that counsel’s errors actually had an adverse effect in that “but for” the errors the result of the proceeding probably would have been different
- stating that a defendant must show that “but for the errors the result of the proceeding probably would have been different”
- stating that \it is not proper under Strickland to base a reversal on speculation\
- requiring a showing that, but for the error of counsel, the outcome would have been different
- rejecting ineffective-assistance claim without considering first prong of the Strickland test because petitioner did not prove that the result of the trial would have been different but for counsel’s alleged mistakes
- court may dispose of ineffectiveness claim solely by finding failure to prove that outcome may have been different
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amdahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-26· cited 235×
- State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-12-09· cited 188×
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-05-07· cited 135×
- Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-04-08· cited 130×
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-03-20· cited 119×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-10-08· cited 87×
- Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-05-01· cited 80×
- State v. LahueSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-10-29· cited 72×
- Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-10-04· cited 60×
- State v. BoboSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-07-30· cited 60×
- State v. BeecroftSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-05-23· cited 58×
- State v. DeWaldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-11-30· cited 56×
- State v. BlissSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-07-06· cited 55×
- State v. DopplerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-11· cited 55×
- Fratzke v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-01-05· cited 52×
- State v. WalenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-05-29· cited 51×
- State v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-07-23· cited 49×
- State v. WembleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-04-25· cited 47×
- Dereje v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-10-09· cited 47×
- State v. NissalkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-07-13· cited 43×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.