Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 12/5/1955

Affronti v. United States

Citations

  • 350 U.S. 79
  • 76 S. Ct. 171
  • 100 L. Ed. 2d 62
  • 1955 U.S. LEXIS 35
  • 100 L. Ed. 62

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting Congress enacted the Probation Act in 1925 in response to Ex Parte United States
  • “The mere fact that a timely motion to quash was not filed does not overcome the presumption of effectiveness. The delay might be considered sound trial strategy, particularly since the codefendant could not be found. We cannot infer lack of effective counsel from this circumstance alone.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

998 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Affronti v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.