Oregon Supreme Court· 6/22/2006

State v. Woodman

Citations

138 P.3d 1
341 Or. 105
2006 Ore. LEXIS 592

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that trial court did not err when it instructed jury in murder case that “phrase ‘intentionally caused the death of [the victim]’ ” meant “a conscious objective either to cause a particular result, or to engage in particular conduct”
post-verdict juror affidavits and testimony are not admissible to establish the mental processes jurors used in reaching verdict
“In determining whether it was error to give a particular instruction, we read the instructions as a whole to determine whether they state the law accurately.”
“In determining whether it was error to give a particular instruction, we read the instructions as a whole to determine whether they state the law accurately.”
no error when instructions, read as a whole, “accurately reflected the statutory requirements”
for intentional murder, intent applies to “causing the death” of the victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Balmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.