Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/23/2014

State v. Bistrika

Citations

  • 262 Or. App. 385
  • 324 P.3d 584
  • 2014 WL 1628117
  • 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s challenges to the sufficiency of evidence were unpreserved when the theory that the defendant presented to the trial court differed substantively from the theory the defendant presented on appeal
  • noting the standard for granting an MJOA as “whether a rational factfinder could find that the state proved every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt”
  • We will reverse based on an instructional error only if we can “fairly say that the instruction probably created an erroneous impres- sion of the law in the minds of the jurors which affected the outcome of the case.” (Internal quotation marks and brack- ets omitted.)
  • We will reverse based on an instructional error only if we can “fairly say that the instruction probably created an erroneous impres- sion of the law in the minds of the jurors which affected the outcome of the case.” (Internal quotation marks and brack- ets omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan, Schuman, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.