State v. Longoria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the trial court erred in giving the provocation instruction when there was no evi- dence that would allow a jury to find that the defendant’s theft was done with the intent of provoking the owner to react physically so that the defendant could then injure or kill the owner
• the trial court erred in giv- ing the provocation instruction when there was no evidence that would allow a jury to find that the defendant’s theft was done with the intent of provoking the owner to react physically so that the defendant could then injure or kill the owner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. North
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-06-12· cited 8×
• State v. McClain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16· cited 4×
• State v. Vanderlinden
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-01-14· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Clemente-Perez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-09-17· cited 96×
• Montara Owners Assn. v. La Noue Development, LLC
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-06-18· cited 55×
• State v. Pine
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-12-26· cited 46×
• State v. Bistrika
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-23· cited 17×
• State v. Sparks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-26· cited 11×
• State v. Nguyen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-08-22· cited 10×
• State v. Mechler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-11-04· cited 3×