Skip to main content

State v. Crosby

Citations

  • 154 P.3d 97
  • 342 Or. 419
  • 2007 Ore. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the correctness of an instruction given by the trial court where the defendant had objected to the instruction but had not proffered an alternative
  • describing mental states and their application to three different types of material elements: conduct, circumstances, or results
  • in Woodman, it made no difference whether “causing death” is result or conduct, so court did not decide that question
  • the object of the mental state depends on how the substantive statute uses the term
  • “Conduct * * * [is one of] the types of material elements that will be found in criminal statutes.”
  • “[W]e read the instructions as a whole to determine 120 State v. Horn-Garcia whether they state the law accurately.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Carson, Gillette, Durham, Balmer, Kistler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.