State v. Morgan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that words used in definitions can imply, and therefore require, a mental state without explicitly including one
• holding that “to establish that defendant was ‘aided by another person actually present’ and therefore was guilty of second-degree robbery under ORS 164.405(1)(b), the state was required to prove that the person who aided defendant acted with the intent to facilitate the robbery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Butterfield
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-05-08· cited 10×
• Mason v. BCK Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-07-05· cited 8×
• State v. Holsclaw
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-07-19· cited 8×
• State v. Stavenjord
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-07· cited 3×
• State v. B. I. Z. V.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-05-30· cited 2×
• State v. McNair
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-01-31· cited 1×
• State v. Odneal
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-29· cited 1×
• State v. Morgan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-02-16
• Mitchell v. BOLI
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-05-13

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Comcast Corp. v. Department of Revenue
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-10-02· cited 168×
• State v. Rose
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-02· cited 81×
• State v. Walker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-21· cited 81×
• State v. Gonzalez-Valenzuela
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-12-24· cited 71×
• State v. Simonov
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-02-04· cited 54×
• State v. Pine
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-12-26· cited 46×
• State v. Phillips
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-12-27· cited 38×
• State v. Morgan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-11-12· cited 4×