Skip to main content

State v. Olsen

Citations

  • 824 N.W.2d 334
  • 2012 Minn. App. LEXIS 142
  • 2012 WL 6554431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that evidence of a witness’s prior sexual conduct is assumed to be “highly prejudicial”
  • “[E]vidence [of a victim’s prior sexual conduct] is . . . admissible ‘in all cases in which admission is constitutionally required by the 6 defendant’s right to due process, his right to confront his accusers, or his right to offer evidence in his own defense.’”
  • “An error in excluding [defense] evidence is harmless only if the reviewing court is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that if the evidence had been admitted and the damaging potential of the evidence fully realized, a reasonable jury would have reached the same verdict.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudson, Larkin, Stoneburner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.